HOME PAGE
Saarc leaders pledge unity amid challenges
Marking the 39th charter day amid stalled summit and regional tensions, heads of states and governments of South Asia call for revitalising the regional grouping.
- Post Report
KATHMANDU,
In the face of an existential crisis, the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (Saarc) marked its 39th anniversary on Friday with leaders of member states expressing their determination to work together.
With the eight-member bloc struggling to convene regular summit meetings—the 19th, initially planned for Pakistan, was cancelled due to India-Pakistan tensions—Nepal has continued to chair the grouping since the 18th summit held in Kathmandu in November 2014. Similarly, the meetings of the Saarc foreign ministers, which is also called the Saarc Council of Ministers, remains stalled for the past three years.
On Friday, on the occasion of the 39th Saarc Charter Day, heads of governments of member states issued statements reaffirming their commitment to bolster the organisation for the full realisation of its charter objectives, according to the Kathmandu-based Saarc Secretariat.
The first Saarc Summit in Dhaka, Bangladesh adopted the Saarc Charter on December 8, 1985.
A forum of eight countries in South Asia that are bound by ties of history and culture, Saarc, as per the charter, embodies the determination of its member states to regional peace, stability, amity and progress. This commitment is rooted in principles including sovereign equality, territorial integrity, national independence, non-use of force and non-interference in the internal affairs of other States and peaceful settlement of disputes.
“The need for closer cooperation is ever greater, given the still existing old challenge like poverty, malnutrition, along with new and emerging challenges such as climate change, cybersecurity, and natural disasters exacerbated by adverse climate,” Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal said in a statement issued on the occasion, adding, “In this context, we must reinforce the values of understanding, trust, solidarity and cooperation as enshrined in the Saarc Charter through common efforts and harmonious actions.”
Although Afghanistan is also a Saarc member, it has been excluded from the process following the Taliban takeover of the country in 2021. As a founding member and chair of Saarc, Nepal is fully committed to doing its part to energise the Saarc process and make it more vibrant, effective and result oriented, said Dahal.
Meanwhile, Nepal, the current chair, has been facing criticism for not doing enough to revitalise the subdued Saarc process. The summit scheduled in Islamabad was cancelled after an attack on an Indian army camp in Kashmir. India accused Pakistan of the attack and decided to pull out, a decision that was backed by the majority of member states. The crisis in Afghanistan following the Taliban takeover further complicated the Saarc process, with seven member states yet to recognize the new regime in Kabul.
“The founding objective of Saarc—to work together for the benefit of the people of South Asia—is possible only in an environment of peace and security,” Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi said in his message, adding, “India remains committed to realising this objective and will continue to adopt cooperative and positive approach in this regard.”
“While we celebrate the anniversary of the Saarc Charter Day, let us resolve to work together to realise the shared vision for a peaceful and prosperous South Asia,” said Modi.
Similarly, Anwaar-ul-Haq Kakar, the caretaker Prime Minister of Pakistan in his message on the occasion stated that Pakistan is fully committed to the organisation and is actively participating in Saarc processes and activities.
“Pakistan is a firm believer in the strength and potential of regional cooperation for national and regional development. It further believes that result-oriented regional cooperation can be achieved only by adhering to the cardinal principles of sovereign equality and mutual respect, as enshrined in the Saarc Charter,” he said while expressing confidence in overcoming current hindrances, and enabling Saarc member states to forge ahead on the path of mutually-beneficial regional cooperation.
For the past few years, the Saarc Secretariat has been carrying out routine activities and meetings of lower-level mechanisms are taking place, but no there have been no significant developments.
Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, in her statement issued to mark the day, stressed the need for regional cooperation in view of the recent developments in world affairs. “As one of the founding members of Saarc, Bangladesh recognises the importance of Saarc for the socio-economic development of the people of the region through collective efforts in various cooperation areas, particularly in trade, investment, energy and connectivity.”
“The Saarc region is undergoing many challenges. I believe our collective efforts could contribute to forging closer cooperation among the member states to overcome the challenges and make Saarc an effective and result-oriented regional organisation,” she said.
Likewise, Chogyal Dago Rigdzin, the chief advisor to the Bhutan government, in his statement expressed Bhutan’s readiness to collaborate with fellow member states in enhancing the Saarc process and achieving the common objective of peace and prosperity in the region.
Similarly, the new president of Maldives, Mohamed Muizzu, also called for a renewed commitment to Saarc charter principles for building a more resilient and interconnected South Asia.
“Let me today reiterate the Maldives’ commitment to achieving the common goals of Saarc and express my sincere hope that as citizens of this region, we will be able to create sustainable peace and prosperity for our people,” he said in his message.
Besides the seven heads of the governments and states, the foreign ministers of Nepal, Bhutan, Maldives and Sri Lanka also issued statements expressing their commitment to the stagnant Saarc process.
Sri Lankan Prime Minister Dinesh Gunawardena issued a separate statement and called for recognizing the Saarc’s achievements by enhancing cooperation among the member states to advance towards the charter’s objectives.
The president of Sri Lanka Ranil Wickremesinghe said his country recognizes Saarc’s immense potential, prospects, and opportunities available, which can be seized, through collective efforts.
“With an unrelenting commitment on the part of us, member states soldiering as one family, I am confident that Saarc can metamorphose into a more viable regional organisation to serve the prosperity of our region,” said Wickremesinghe.
HOME PAGE
Rights watchdog’s recommendations snubbed, persistently
Amid government inaction on the recommendations, individuals flagged for action promoted and rewarded.
- BINOD GHIMIRE
KATHMANDU,
It’s an old and rather depressing story.
Despite their repeated commitments, successive governments have been indifferent to implementing the recommendations of the National Human Rights Commission.
Established in 2000, the constitutional human rights watchdog received 13,213 complaints until the last fiscal year. So far, it has recommended government action in 1,407 cases, criminal investigation and departmental action against officials involved, and monetary compensation for the victims.
However, only 15.3 percent of the recommendations have been fully implemented, as per the report for the fiscal year 2022-23 submitted to President Ramchandra Paudel on Thursday. While 39.2 percent of the recommendations have been partly addressed, 45.5 percent have yet to be implemented.
In the 23 years since its establishment, the commission has recommended actions against 358 individuals, but only 37 of them have been punished. In some instances, the government has promoted security officials named in the commission’s investigation, instead of taking action against them.
As per the annual report, the commission has recommended monetary compensation totalling Rs280 million to the victims, but the government has distributed only Rs70 million. “Non-implementation of the recommendations has raised questions over the commission’s significance. It has also shattered the victims’ right to justice,” reads the report. “It has also promoted impunity.”
Officials at the commission say the government’s snubbing of the recommendations show it is not serious about protecting and promoting human rights. “The government either has to implement the commission’s recommendations or give reasons, if any, for not implementing them,” said Murari Kharel, acting secretary at the commission. “Right now, the recommendations remain unimplemented without any reason.”
The report presented to the commission also says the government must be serious about heeding the recommendations.
Given the government’s lack of action, the commission in October 2020 made public a list of 286 people, including former top government and security officials implicated in serious human rights violations over the past two decades, in an attempt to build pressure for action.
Among the total human rights violators implicated by the commission since its formation in 2000, the highest (98) are from the Nepal Police, followed by the Nepal Army (85) and then CPN-Maoist (65).
The commission has also implicated 16 civil servants and eight Armed Police Force personnel in rights abuses.
The government, on the one hand, is indifferent to implementing the recommendations, while the commission, the constitutional body authorised to protect and promote human rights, on the other hand, has fared dismally when it comes to investigating the cases lodged with it.
The number of complaints were high during the Maoist insurgency, which ended with the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Accord in November 2006. However, thousands of complaints including those from the insurgency remain unaddressed. As per the report, the commission is yet to decide on 4,100 complaints, most of them from the insurgency era.
“We have already completed our probe into 1,500 of the complaints. We may recommend action in those cases after the commission gives its final opinion,” said Kharel. In each case, the chief commissioner and the majority of commissioners make the final decision.
The commission has pointed out lack of adequate economic and human resources, absence of proper office facilities and traditional mindset to human rights as the barriers to its smooth operation. Of the 309 positions allotted to the commission, 93 including the secretary and three joint-secretary positions remain vacant.
Former officials at the commission say complaints have been piling up ever since the commission’s establishment. Bed Bhattarai, a former secretary at the commission, said in addition to the lack of adequate resources, disputes within the commission and a low staff morale are responsible for delays in investigations.
“If the commission’s leadership wants, it can hire temporary investigators in collaboration with the Nepal Bar Association or recruit retired police officials to expedite investigations. It is already too late to clear the backlog,” Bhattarai told the Post. “But I don’t think the commission, enmeshed in internal feud, would take any proactive measures.”
HOME PAGE
Vladimir Putin of Russia: The autocrat eyeing a new world order
As Russia’s military has largely repulsed the months-long Ukrainian counter-offensive, Putin has resumed foreign travel.
- AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE
WARSAW,
Russian President Vladimir Putin, who announced on Friday he is running for a fifth term, has over the past two decades built a system of domestic repression and confrontation with the West that is almost certain to guarantee his re-election.
Ever since the former little-known KGB agent first became president on New Year’s Eve 1999, he has consolidated power by bringing oligarchs
to heel, banning any real opposition, and turning Russia into an authoritarian state. Abroad, he has led world efforts to challenge the dominance of the West.
His grip on power further tightened in the wake of his decision to invade Ukraine in February 2022, with public dissent against the war effectively silenced through lengthy prison terms for critics.
Friday, the 71-year-old said after a military awards ceremony at the Kremlin that—as expected—he will run in next March’s presidential elections.
His rule has risked being defined by the war in Ukraine, which has cost many thousands of lives and sparked unprecedented Western sanctions that have created major tensions in the economy.
There were large anti-war protests in the day after he ordered troops into Ukraine in the early hours of February 24, 2022.
They were quickly put down but were followed months later by more demonstrations when the government was forced to announce a partial mobilisation after Russia failed to topple Ukraine’s government in the opening offensive of the war.
The most serious challenge to his long rule came in June 2023 when Yevgeny Prigozhin, a long-time ally and head of the Wagner mercenary group announced a mutiny to unseat the military leadership.
The bloody uprising threatened to tarnish Putin’s self-created image as a strategic genius who likes to compare himself to Peter the Great—the reform-minded emperor who expanded Russia’s borders.
But in recent months, Putin has demonstrated his lasting power. Domestic opposition has been
largely silent, the economy is growing again, the Russian military has largely repulsed a recent Ukrainian offensive, and he has resumed foreign travel.
Putin started out as an intelligence officer before embarking on a political career in the mayor’s office in his native Saint Petersburg in 1991 as the Soviet Union was falling apart.
Yeltsin, Russia’s first president, appointed him as head of the FSB security service in 1998, and as prime minister the following year.
It was a carefully planned strategy, culminating in his nomination as acting president when Yeltsin resigned.
Putin won his first presidential election in March 2000 and a second term in 2004.
His rise initially spurred hopes that Russia would reform and become a predictable, democratic partner on the global stage.
Putin gained popularity by promising stability to a country still reeling from a decade of humiliation and economic chaos following the Soviet collapse.
Then-US President George W Bush hailed him as a “remarkable leader”. Russia’s leader grew close with Germany’s Gerhard Schroeder and Italy’s Silvio Berlusconi, even as he clamped down on media and waged a ruthless war in Chechnya.
Two decades later, that goodwill has gone.
Joe Biden—the fifth US president of Putin’s tenure—called him a “killer,” even before the launch of full-scale hostilities in Ukraine.
After two stints as president, Putin switched back to being prime minister in 2008 to get around a constitutional ban on more than two consecutive terms.
But he kept the reins of power firmly in hand and returned to the presidency in 2012 despite pro-democracy protests in Moscow, winning a fourth term in 2018.
He jailed his loudest rival, Alexei Navalny, in 2021 shortly after being accused by the West and the opposition leader of ordering Navalny’s poisoning with a Soviet-designed nerve agent.
The clampdown on opposition movements ramped up after the launch of hostilities in Ukraine, with thousands of Russians handed long prison sentences on newly beefed-up censorship laws.
The West imposed sanctions that effectively cut off Russia from the global banking system, adding to the Russian leadership’s siege mentality.
In October, Putin accused Europe of creating a “new Iron Curtain” and said Russia was building “a new world” that would not be based on Western hegemony.
He has also increasingly pushed a domestic agenda of nationalism and social conservatism, including most recently laws against Russia’s LGBTQ community.
Persona non grata among Western leaders after the invasion, the Russian strongman has sought to pivot east, wooing India and China with increased energy exports.
After shrinking in 2022, the Russian economy began to grow again in the second quarter of this year despite high inflation, a weakening of the ruble and a drastic increase in defence spending.
The war failed in its initial aims to topple Ukraine’s government and Russia was forced into a series of humiliating setbacks by the determined defence of the much smaller Ukrainian army.
But, as the war nears its second anniversary, Putin has been speaking with increased confidence about Russia’s prospects on the battlefield—a topic he avoided for many months.
Russian forces have successfully held off a much-hyped Ukrainian counter-offensive and there are increasing doubts about the continuation of Western military supplies.
Wrangling in Washington in recent weeks has held up tens of billions in military aid for Ukraine, prompting alarmist warnings from the US administration.
“Congress has to decide whether to continue to support the fight for freedom in Ukraine... or whether Congress will ignore the lessons we’ve learned from history and let Putin prevail,” National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said.