HOME PAGE
Congress rejects PM’s defence of Lamichhane
CPN-UML chief Oli dismisses the main opposition party’s call for a parliamentary probe on the home minister.
- BINOD GHIMIRE
KATHMANDU,
The Nepali Congress has demanded that the government and ruling parties form a parliamentary panel to investigate cooperative fraud charges against Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Home Affairs Rabi Lamichhane, or it will obstruct the Parliament.
The main opposition party asked for a parliamentary panel saying it was not satisfied with Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal’s clarification on the matter. Starting last week, the largest party had been pressing for his clarification over Lamichhane’s alleged involvement in the fraud involving millions of rupees.
Appearing before the Parliament on Tuesday, Dahal said there is no evidence to implicate his home minister in the fraud case. He said after minutely studying police investigation into the fraud at the Pokhara-based Surya Darshan Cooperative, he can confidently assert that Lamichhane is clean.
“So far, no investigation suggests he was ever involved in the cooperative in any role, nor has he been named in the case, which is sub-judice,” said Dahal. “As he has already cleared the loan, the police have briefed me that no further investigation is needed against him.”
Dahal, however, said there would be no leniency in taking action against Lamichhane if evidence of his involvement in the fraud emerges. “There will be no compromise in upholding good governance. Nobody, from any party, will be exempt,” he said. “If Lamichhane is involved in the fraud, no force can stop the government from taking action against him.”
He even questioned the Congress, asking whether there could be an agreement in taking action
against everyone against whom cases have been filed with government authorities.
When the Nepali Congress was still in the government, it had been objecting to the CPN-UML’s demands on sacking three ministers including Mohan Bahadur Basnet, then minister for health and population.
Basnet has been under an investigation of the Commission for Investigation of Abuse of Authority for alleged corruption in the procurement of the Telecommunication Traffic Monitoring and Fraud Control System (Teramocs) for the Nepal Telecommunication Authority.
Not satisfied with Dahal’s clarification, the main opposition said either the prime minister was kept in the dark by the investigating authorities or he was not disclosing the facts before Parliament.
“The prime minister said there was no proof to link Lamichhane in the fraud case. I ask what proof he is looking for when there are complaints from the victims, there is evidence of his transactions with the cooperatives and police investigation in the matter continues,” said Ramesh Lekhak, the Congress chief whip. He reiterated his party’s position that Lamichhane’s appointment as home minister, when Nepal Police is investigating his alleged involvement in embezzling cooperative deposits while serving at the Gorkha Media Network, presents a conflict of interest. He also argued that the police organisation, which falls under the jurisdiction of the home minister, cannot undertake a fair investigation.
Victims of cooperative fraud on February 5 had lodged a complaint to the Kaski district police against three people including Lamichhane, who also is the chairperson of the Rastriya Swatantra Party.
A probe by the Pokhara Metropolitan City found that over Rs1.35 billion in public deposits at the cooperative was misappropriated. The probe found that Lamichhane had obtained a loan of Rs10 million from the cooperative by creating a fake account. He has been rejecting the allegations.
Lamichhane, a former television host and managing director of a television channel co-founded by Gitendra Babu (GB) Rai, has been accused of embezzling hundreds of millions of rupees in collusion with Rai from different cooperatives in Kaski, Chitwan and Butwal.
Rai, who was the chairman of the Gorkha Media Network, the mother company of the channel, is accused of illegally transferring Rs300 million from Kaski-based Surya Darshan Cooperative, Rs110.71 million from Chitwan-based Sahara Cooperative, and Rs100.74 million from Supreme Cooperative in Butwal, without providing any collateral.
“The prime minister claims there is no proof against Lamichhane but we see ample evidence to establish his connection,” said Lekhak. “We demand a parliamentary investigation panel to find out the reality. The constitution of such panels has for long been a parliamentary practice.”
Over the years parliamentary teams have been formed to investigate several controversial issues. But most of the time they have been formalities. Most recently, in July 2022, an 11-member committee was formed to investigate charges that the then Finance Minister Janardan Sharma tweaked tax rates with the help of unauthorised persons, a day before he was to present the national budget in Parliament. The panel did not implicate Sharma.
Lekhak said his party doesn’t want to obstruct House proceedings if the prime minister and the ruling parties are serious about its demands. “I urge you to take our concerns seriously. If not, the government would be seen as creating an environment for House obstruction,” he said.
Ruling party leaders, however, accuse the Congress of raising a non-issue and say there is no need for a parliamentary probe into charges against Lamichhane. Talking to journalists after the House meeting, CPN-UML Chairman Oli said, “There is no possibility of forming such a committee.”
HOME PAGE
Ruling five-party alliance unveils an ambitious ‘vision statement’
If this coalition fails to deliver, the nation will slip into crisis, warns Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal.
- Post Report
Kathmandu,
The five ruling parties on Tuesday unveiled an ambitious set of minimum policy priorities and a joint resolution, which is regarded as the government’s vision statement.
At a function at the Prime Minister Office, CPN-UML Vice-chairman Bishnu Poudel read out the government’s policy priorities and joint resolution that encompass corruption control, land management, forestry, climate adaptation and disaster management, among other things.
The preamble of the vision paper states that the government pledges to combat activities that undermine the constitution and its spirit; strengthen the federal democratic republic; and will restore trust and hope among the people by addressing the current economic lethargy, impunity and frustration among professionals.
It also vows to change the negative sentiments, frustration and anger among the youth and work to protect all past achievements made through various struggles. It underscores the government’s commitment to prioritising sovereignty, territorial integrity, and fostering robust and balanced international relations.
The statement addresses youth and sports, tourism, culture, and social harmony, and emphasises women’s participation, empowerment and social inclusion. Further, it commits to address transitional justice, bring sustainable peace, and defend national interests through an independent foreign policy, among other crucial issues.
The preamble of the document titled ‘Minimum Policy Priorities and Common Resolution’ states that the coalition government is committed to instilling hope and confidence among the people by tackling pressing issues like economic downturn and impunity.
It emphasises the urgency to complete outstanding tasks related to the peace process. Additionally, it commits to provide medical treatment, jobs, and rehabilitation to individuals who suffered disabilities during the conflict period (1996-2006). Furthermore, it highlights the necessity of fulfilling the tasks related to compensation, rehabilitation, and reintegration of conflict-hit families.
The common minimum programme includes a commitment to uphold the integrity of financial institutions; improve public infrastructure; promote good governance through efficient service delivery; boost employment, entrepreneurship and domestic production; and coordinate the development of physical infrastructure.
The vision document proposes amending various laws to attract investment, implementing employment-friendly policies, and work towards addressing issues such as slow credit flow, low capital expenditure, and achieving a balance between fiscal and monetary policies.
It also suggests reducing the widening gap between revenue and public expenditure by improving revenue collection, adopting austerity measures, seeking new sources of foreign aid, channelling remittances into productive sectors and making policy changes in the share market.
The statement talks about receiving the green fund, preparing interim and transitional strategies after graduating from the least developed country category in 2026, and emphasises structural transformation in sectors like digitalization, tourism, agriculture, energy, and green industrialisation to generate employment.
It also calls for removing the anomalies in various financial institutions, addressing challenges related to implementing federalism, improvement in service delivery, promotion of good governance, revising laws that are hampering professional environment, enhancing coordination among state organs through technology, and enacting laws to promote inclusiveness, secularism and implementation of federalism in order to ensure effective governance at all levels.
The vision paper proposes a high-level commission to ensure a fair and speedy justice delivery system. Similarly, it suggests forming a task force comprising experts to recommend reforms in public administration, security agencies and public enterprises.
In order to do away with the belief that public office bearers are corrupt and inefficient, the government will work to establish a system of accountability in public administration, judiciary and regulatory bodies, so that those who make mistakes will be punished.
The vision paper also proposes amending the present performance management contract between the political and administrative leadership, promoting the use of the national identity card, and strengthening the Nagarik App to streamline service delivery without the need of multiple documents. It also talks about bringing policy and institutional reforms in public procurement.
The policy paper also vows to strengthen regulatory bodies like the Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority by providing them additional legal support, manpower, resources and equipment to combat corruption. “Corruption and abuse of authority will be investigated and legal proceedings will be initiated to ensure that corrupt people face legal consequences sooner or later.”
The paper also stresses boosting domestic production to increase local capital, promoting agriculture as a tool for economic development, job creation, poverty alleviation and industrialisation, and promises to launch a ‘Make in Nepal’ campaign.
The vision paper of the five ruling parties proposes establishing an employment bank, startup fund, and business incubation centre, and advocates for campaigns like ‘make in Nepal’ and ‘made in Nepal’.
It also discusses promoting gig economy among the youth, launching youth-focused skills program in every local unit, management of land through a land bank, mobilising capital through local banks and financial institutions, ensuring farmers have access to chemical fertilisers and agricultural equipment, prioritising businesses and industries that can reduce imports, and reviving sick businesses through public-private partnerships.
The paper also talks about free and compulsory education for all, safeguarding labour rights, prioritising the welfare of peasants, workers, and marginalised communities, and calls for addressing problems faced by universities.
Furthermore, the paper discusses improving the health sector, expanding insurance coverage, setting up a National Accreditation Centre, ensuring social security and expanding its coverage, expanding the road network and connectivity, setting up a public transport management authority, exploring alternative resources for investment in infrastructure, and launching a national infrastructure development programme.
It also discusses energy security, developing an integrated energy policy, promotion of alternative energy, building infrastructure in information and technology, scientific use of land, digitisation of land records, addressing various land-related issues including landless people, and giving utmost priority to efforts at mitigating climate change.
The document also pledges to adopt a balanced, neutral and non-aligned foreign policy. It pledges to employ effective diplomacy in order to reclaim Nepali territories like Limpiydhura, Kalapani, Lipulek and Susta.
“If this alliance is unable to work, the country will face a crisis,” said the prime minister after unveiling the vision paper. “This alliance was formed to instil hope among the people.”
The vision document was drafted by a task force comprising Paudel and Bishnu Rimal from the CPN-UML, Barshaman Pun and Janardan Sharma from the CPN (Maoist Centre), Swarnim Wagle and Mukul Dhakal from the Rastriya Swatantra Party, Rajendra Shrestha and Manish Suman from the Janata Samjbadi Party, and Pramesh Hamal and Ghanashyam Bhusal form the CPN (Unified Socialist).
HOME PAGE
How will a new national security law affect different walks of life in Hong Kong?
Business people, financial professionals and journalists are concerned.
- KANIS LEUNG,AP
HONG KONG,
As Hong Kong passed a new national security law, the city that evolved from a swampy fishing village to a financial center embarked on another transformation, one that may redefine its role on the world stage and the liberties of its citizens.
For the government and supporters of Beijing, the legislation is the keystone in fulfilling a constitutional duty, heralding a new era focused squarely on economic prosperity. It will take effect on Saturday.
However, for those who value Hong Kong’s once-vibrant political culture and commitment to openness, the legislation exacerbates fears of dwindling Western-style civil liberties that are fundamental to its allure as a global financial hub.
Here’s what you need to know about the new law.
Doesn’t the city already have a national security law?
Four years ago, Beijing imposed a sweeping security law triggered by the massive anti-government protests in 2019.
The law was used to prosecute many leading activists, including media tycoon Jimmy Lai and former student leaders like Joshua Wong and Lester Shum. Others were silenced or forced into self-exile. Dozens of civil society groups facing police investigations and other obstacles closed, as well as vocal pro-democracy media outlets Apple Daily and Stand News. The drastic political changes prompted a large number of young professionals and middle-class families to emigrate to Britain, Canada, Taiwan, Australia and the United States, among other places.
Beijing and Hong Kong governments say the law helped bring back stability.
Why does the city need a new law?
Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, the Basic Law, requires the city to enact a home-grown national security law.
In 2003, an attempt to pass a version of the law sparked a street protest that drew half a million people who feared the legislative efforts would erode the city’s freedoms. The legislation was shelved.
Then, in late January, a public consultation on the legislation resurfaced. Hong Kong leader John Lee said the legislation is needed to fulfill a long-overdue duty, and often referred to the 2019 protests to justify that need, saying it will keep Hong Kong safe against “potential sabotage” and “undercurrents that try to create troubles” — particularly lurking ideas about Hong Kong independence. Some foreign agents might still be active in Hong Kong, he added.
“This is a law to tell people not to attack us,” Lee said.
What is the new law about?
As proposed in the Safeguarding National Security Bill, the new law expands the government’s power to stamp out future challenges to its rule, punishing treason and insurrection with up to life imprisonment.
The law also includes stiff prison terms for other offenses, including up to 20 years for espionage and up to 10 years for the unlawful disclosure of state secrets. Some provisions allow criminal prosecutions for certain acts committed anywhere in the world.
Additionally, tougher penalties would be imposed on people convicted of working with foreign governments or organizations to commit certain offenses. For example, residents who damage public infrastructure with the intent to endanger national security could be jailed for 20 years — or life, if they collude with an external force to do so.
The law could curb disruptive protests like the one in 2019 when dissenters occupied the airport and vandalized railway stations.
How will this affect business people, financial professionals and journalists?
Financial professionals who often deal with sensitive corporate information are worried about some provisions related to the protection of state secrets because they echo the broad definition of secrets used in mainland China, which covers economic, social and technological developments beyond traditional security fields.
While the offenses outlined in the new law pertain to acts conducted without lawful authority, there is anxiety that the law may create gray areas.
Some foreign business leaders said the cost of complying with the new law could result in investors directing their capital elsewhere. Investment decisions for Western businesses weigh on the balance between social stability and an open and legally predictable business environment, they said.
Journalists are concerned their reporting might also inadvertently lead to legal issues. A leading media professional group, Hong Kong Journalists Association, pointed to some provisions involving state secrets that do not require proof of intent to harm national security. Although the government added a public interest defense in the bill, the scope is more limited than what they had recommended, the association said.
The government has tried to assuage the concerns, saying the legislation targets “an extremely small minority of people” who endanger national security, and insisting that normal business people, individuals, organizations, and the media sector “will not unwittingly violate the law.”
How about activists?
After the 2019 protests, the city’s colonial-era sedition law has been increasingly used to target dissidents.
Under the new bill, activists will face harsher penalties if they break the sedition law. They face seven years in prison if convicted for committing seditious acts or uttering seditious words — up from the current maximum sentence of two years. Colluding with an external force to carry out such activities is now punishable by up to 10 years, and it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove intent to incite public disorder or violence.
Amnesty International’s China Director Sarah Brooks worried that the new crime broadly defined as “external interference” could lead to the prosecution of activists who interacted with overseas individuals or organizations and be “framed as ‘endangering national security.’”
The law also authorizes stiffer measures against suspects in national security cases: Police can apply to the court to extend detention without charges and prohibit suspects from consulting certain legal representatives. Some legal scholars and rights advocates say this would undermine due process.
Authorities would also be empowered to use financial sanctions to punish people who have fled abroad, potentially preventing them from being hired, leasing property, or starting businesses.
In 2023, police offered bounties of 1 million Hong Kong dollars ($128,000) on more than a dozen activists living abroad, including former lawmakers Nathan Law and Ted Hui, whom they accuse of colluding with external forces to impose sanctions on Hong Kong and China.
How about residents who are not politically active?
The new law requires Chinese citizens to report to authorities if they know others are committing treason. Failure to report could be penalized by up to 14 years in prison. Ronny Tong, an adviser to the city leader, has said religious professionals are not exempt, even if they heard about the acts
during confession.
On Friday, the Catholic Diocese of Hong Kong assured believers that the new legislation will not change the confidential nature of confession. Still, the diocese acknowledged citizens have an obligation to ensure national security.
During one legislative discussion, officials were asked whether residents keeping copies of Apple Daily newspaper at home would be considered as possessing a seditious publication — an offense punishable by up to three years in jail. Security minister Chris Tang said it would be a reasonable defense if residents argued they had no recollection the publication was still in the home and it was not used for incitement.